While each of the three companies have different approaches to mobile, they all agreed that it’s definitely not going away anytime soon.  Crowley agreed the Foursquare is not the winner of location, but simply one of many options.  He disagreed that Google Latitude’s passive check-in model isn’t the way to go as making users check-in makes it more interactive.

When asked about location for Facebook, Cox pointed that that a large amount of Facebook postings are based around location.  Whether that content is status updates or photos, it usually tends to focus around things that are happening in certain locations at a certain time.  Given that, it only makes sense that Facebook would get into location, even if only for geo-tagging.

Guntroda, on the other hand, didn’t agree that geo-tagging as in Google Buzz doesn’t count as checking in to locations.  He highlighted that Google Latitude has 3 million users, and touted the privacy options like the mutual following model and that you can set just what level of location (exact location versus city-level).

In terms of Facebook privacy, Cox pointed out that on Wednesday Facebook will be rolling out new, simple privacy options.  He acknowledged that there has been a privacy issue and that the company wanted to have a solution before saying anything about it.

When asked what the cell phones of the future will be like, nobody was sure.  One thing they could all agree on was that future phones will need much bigger batteries than we have now.  The three panelists also talked about how phones will have to be smarter, will have to be able to determine your location, and who/what is around you and react accordingly.

At last night’s “Future of Women’s Fashion” panel in New York City, editors Cindi Leive and Robin Givhan (fashion editors at Glamour and the Washington Post, respectively) and design voices Isaac Mizrahi and Ashley Olsen met in front of a varied audience to discuss several questions about the fashion industry: namely, why do so many people hate fashion so much, and what can be done to bring them in?

Among the night’s conclusions was the idea that, for fashion to survive, it must be seen no longer as something shallow and frivolous.  This means the industry can no longer “[coast] on trendy handbags and trendy shoes,” but rather must work from the inside out to offer intelligent, beautiful design that speaks to (and includes) a multitude of people — thus becoming something more democratic.  We say: let the fashion revolution begin.

Read the full story {The Huffington Post}